Thoughts on Internet Privacy
(Shhh...don't tell anyone!)
Today is the day Google's new Privacy Policy goes into effect. I haven't read it. I might. I know what I know about it from news reports and blogs. I figured today would be as good a day as any to polish up this work-in-progress and finally post it. So here you are.
I continue to fail to understand the notion that on "the Internet" everyone SHOULD be anonymous by default and "going public" is an opt-in scenario. In this information age, this is an antiquated way of doing things.
Damn near everything we do--those of us who aren't hermits or luddites--IS trackable by default. So when do we stop treating the privacy wonks like they're the majority? ARE they the majority? Do MOST people truly care about this? (We could argue forever about whether or not they should…but that's not my point.)
We Americans have a long history of hanging on to things for no other reason than because we always have. It's why you can still ride your horse down the middle of main street and cars have to wait for you. It's why a hundred years from now merchants will still be obligated to accept hard currency as payment. And it's why now, when (I assert) most people don't give a damn about their privacy, as evidenced by the millions who join Facebook and never alter the default security settings and who never EVER read a EULA or a privacy statement, a vocal minority cries "foul!" in their name when companies do what they said they would do--track everything you do.
I. Don't. Care.
I think I used to. Maybe. And I reserve the right to some day change my mind and start caring about this again. But these companies don't care about "me". Or you. Or anyone else. They care about aggregate data which they analyze to determine trends and target information, most notably advertising. This has been going on for as long as advertising has existed. You don't send catalogs advertising fur coats to Hawaii. That's a no-brainer. As someone with something to sell and a limited advertising budget, you want to know who is most likely to buy your stuff. Information such as browsing histories and even the contents of your e-mail is all tossed together to help companies get the biggest bang for their advertising dollar.
And I'm good with that. I know the potential to abuse this information exists. But I'm willing to take my chances. The argument that those who advocate for Privacy Rights must have something to hide is crap and I know it. I'm not making that argument. But I really don't have anything to hide. So I personally don't see the point of bothering to. I live my daily existence making three assumptions:
- Everything I type on any computer anywhere is being seen and read by everyone, everywhere.
- Everything I say on any telephone is being heard by everyone, everywhere.
- Every time I leave my house, someone is taking my picture.
I assume those three things and behave accordingly. Is that sad? Is it "giving in"? Maybe. But in my analysis, it's far easier to "own" my behavior and its consequences than it is to exercise the level of paranoia and subsequent action that would be necessary to obviate those three assumptions. I don't want to live like that! There are some things that simply must be kept private and secret because People Suck. Things like your Social Security number, bank account info, and passwords/PINs for accessing them. But the rest of it? Meh. Google/Facebook/Twitter/Pinterest are all welcome to it!
Little Things That Remind Me Why I Love My Job
Born Free, Taxed To Death
It's about trade-offs and choices
I was about to usurp a Facebook friend's wall for this, but thought better of it. No longer a village of Potsdam resident, she commented on yesterday's vote to NOT dissolve the village; recalling that the tax burden was too much for her, but that the majority of current residents "apparently likes it this way."
Yes I do! Here's why:
Tangibles: Most notably water & sewer. I don't know what it costs to maintain one's own water supply and waste disposal system, but I'm pretty sure I don't want to know. I do know that they are NOT trouble-free. Lit streets where you can walk at night in safety on maintained sidewalks.
Intangibles (i.e., "variable" : Living in the village, I can practically walk most places. Even if I choose to drive (and I usually do), it's not far. It costs me $0.25/mile to operate my car. (All gas and other expenses since I've owned it...there's an app for that!) If I move, say, 5 miles away from where I work, putting me outside the village, that gives me a 10 mile commute. Figure a liberal 250 workdays a year, that's $625 just getting back and forth to work, nevermind errands into town for life's other essentials. Two people work? Two cars? Do the math. It adds up fast! A friend of mine lives about 25 miles from work. If it costs him the same amount to operate his vehicle ($0.25), he spends over $3,000 a year just going back and forth to work!
I could go on, but those things alone put me close to my Village tax bill all by themselves.
People who choose to locate, be it residentially or commercially, inside the Village do so because they ascribe value and benefit to being located there where there are sidewalks, trash and yard waste removal, where you are within ready walking distance of our shops and restaurants, and where you don't have to maintain a well or a septic system. I know I don't speak for everyone on this matter, but some of us are willing to pay for those benefits and don't find our taxes unreasonable.
People who don't want those benefits--those who don't think it's worth the added cost--locate outside the Village. They pay a different price in the way of relative inconvenience. Having to maintain those systems I listed themselves and having to get in their cars to do almost anything. It boils down to personal preference. No one is "right" or "wrong." Life for some people is likely cheaper outside the village, if you calculate "cheaper" by simply looking at tax bills. But I submit it's way more complicated than that.











